OF

A.

ACTS, (Divine,) hard to deter-
mine what shall be so called
304

Adoration, see Worship
̓Αγένητος and ̓Αγέννητος, how they
differ, and which of them ap-
plicable to Christ 239, 245,
462, 464

Alexander of Alexandria cited
and vindicated
49, 275
Ancients, necessary to be referred
to in the present controversy
xx-xxiii

in what cases, and how far
their testimonies are to be ad-
mitted
446

their words, in some cases,
not to be too rigorously inter-
preted
310, 313
exclude not the Son from
the one Godhead

God

66

deny that the Son is another

67

and yet make the Father
and Son to be two Gods 182,
189

make metaphysics their last
retreat 4, 63, 105, 307, 391,
399, 448, 467, 470, 475
fix new ideas to old terms
288, 303, 305, 471
their fundamental error,
399

what
Athanasius cited and vindicated

62, 276, 402, 403, 459
Greg. Nazianzen's character
418, 420

of him

K k 2

C.
Characters of the one true God
applied to the Son
207
Clarke, (Dr.) his notion of indi-
vidual substance
299, 398
of idol mediators 345, 346
his distinction of will of ap-
probation, and will of choice
288

partial in his quotations.
' 446, 464
his propositions novel and
false
441
Clemens of Alexandria cited and
vindicated 66, 87, 95, 134, 254,
257, 273, 358, 359
Coequality confounded with co-
ordination
consistent with priority of
order
23, 94, 179, 400
Creation, by or through Christ,
how to be understood 31, 172
by the three Persons in con-

cert

94

311

164

Eternity ascribed to Father and
Son in the same Scripture-
phrases

226

Eusebius cited 36, 117, 141, 154,

313, 373
How far his authority is to

36, 380

be received
Exclusive terms sometimes leave
room for tacit exceptions

29,
52, 78

to be understood only in
opposition to what they are op-
53, 92, 182, 356

posed to

230

is the head of both the other
Persons
61
Father's divinity, every argument
for it defeated by the modern
Arians
Fathers, (Ante-Nicene) constant-
ly appealed to by the Catholics
in the Arian controversy, (see
Ancients)
v-xix
Fundamental article of religion;
the controverted article such a
15

137

one

Derived and underived, the cha-
racters considered
203
Dionysius of Alexandria cited and
vindicated
43, 111, 274
of Rome cited and vindi-
108, 111, 274, 316

cated
Ditheism charged upon the mo-

dern Arians

182, 189

Dominion expressed by Lord, and

G.

Generation of the Son, temporal
and eternal, asserted by the an-
cients
262

a threefold generation as-
serted by the ancients

290

but neither of them imply-
ing mutability or change 291

what they understood by
eternal generation

268

How they understood it to