Page images
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]


from the æther at the instant the negative cell passes out through the surface, but perhaps rather at the instant that it comes out from the molecule.

In other words, energy may be regarded as flowing in through the surface, but is only absorbed and converted into kinetic energy when it passes into a molecule.

9. Maxwell has calculated the enormous pressure along the lines of force and the equal tension at right angles to them required, according to his theory, to account for the attraction of the earth by the sun. A minimum value for the amount of energy in one cubic centimetre of gravitational æther can be calculated by finding the negative energy-density on the surface of tħe sun considered as a body of uniform density.

47 The volume of the energy-cells at any point is The intensity of the gravitational field on the surface of

M the sun is He= where M is the mass and r the radius of this body. If p is the density of the sun the volume of an energy-cell is 474 471p4

M? (προ)? 4πρ 2"

() ,2 The amount of energy lacking in each of these cells is half a unit. Hence one cubic centimetre of æther lacks z p?po2 units. These are static units of energy. One dyne equals 1:544 x 10' static units of force, therefore one erg equals 1:544 x 107 static units of energy,

Take r as 6370000 x 100 x 110 centim. and p as 1:39. Then the density of negative energy

at the surface of the sun will be
2 X1.392 x 6372 x 1102 x 1012
1:514 x 10

ergs per c.c.
= 4:289 x 1014 ergs per c.c.
= 42.89 x 106 joules per c.c.

= 16 horse-power hours per c.c. This would seem to mean that, at a distance from all gravitating matter, a cubic centimetre of æther contains at least this amount of

energy. 10. That the theory may require an even greater energydensity than this is seen as follows. Suppose the energy of the gravitational æther to be due to vortex filaments or tubes of directed energy interlacing in every direction. Take at any point three axes at right angles to one another. The irregular distribution can be replaced in imagination by six equal sets of filaments parallel to the positive and negative directions of these three axes.

In space at a great distance from gravitational matter each of these sets of filaments will contain the same amount of energy. Let 6a be the amount of energy in one cubic centimetre of free æther. Let the positive direction of the X. axis at a point correspond with the positive direction of the gravitational line of force at that point. Let b be the volume of the gravitational energy-cell. Then five sets of filaments in the cell may contain 5ab units of energy, and the sixth, which has the direction of the X-axis, ab- 1 units. gether the cell will contain 6ab-1 units, while the same volume at a distance from gravitational matter will contain 6ab units of energy.

This would require the existence of 96 or say 100 horsepower hours in every cubic centimetre.

11. It is an interesting question whether this theory of energy-distribution in gravitational æther is or is not the simplest and most probable. That other distributions are conceivable appears' evident. For example, the æther along the straight line joining the centres of two bodies might be regarded as a stretched elastic cord, the laws of contraction being of course quite different from those which hold for ordinary elastic bodies.

Another explanation which seems possible in the case of two gravitational particles is as follows. In the energy diagram for two equal electrified particles with opposite sign, suppose each infinitesimal tube of polarization to be divided into two equal tubes with opposite directions. If they are regarded as vortex filaments, each vortex will work in with its neighbours rotating the other way, like one frictionpulley on another.

Then it is clear that there is no way in which we can regard the two particles as opposed in siyn, and yet if each of the two sets of vortex filaments acts as electrostatic tubes always act, the particles will be attracted together.

The energy-flow in this case will be as indicated in fig. 1, and the distribution of energy-density as in fig. 3. It has not been found possible to map the energy field in this manner for three or more particles. Indeed, the difficulties are such that it seems improbable that this method can be applied.

12. In conclusion it may be well to notice again the assumption on which this paper is based : that the energy-cells preserve their identity, and carry the same energy with them throughout their path. It is not clear that this is necessarily

true. It may be that energy passes from the potential into the kinetic form in the æther itself, and not merely on the surface of the molecules. Kinetic energy may consist of the motion of the whole system of energy-cells. This would lead us very near the theory which regards the molecule as being nothing but the mathematical centre from which forces

proceed, or perhaps, from another point of view, as having infinite extension.

XXXV. On a Simple Form of Harmonic Analyser. By

GEORGE UDNY YULE, Demonstrator in Applied Mathematics, University College, London *.

“ The subject of the decomposition of an arbitrary function into the sum of functions of special types has many fascinations. No student of mathematical physics, if he possess any soul at all, cao fail to recognize the poetry that pervades this branch of mathematics."-OLIVER HEAVISIDE.

§ 1.

BOUT a year ago several instruments for deter-

mining the coefficients of a Fourier Series expressing the equation to a given curve were described before this Society by Professor Henrici . One of them, Professor Henrici's shifting-table analyser, used a planimeter as the integrator; an arrangement that seemed to me very noteworthy from the point of view of simplicity and cheapness. The analyser I am going to describe also uses a planimeter : consequently it can also only give the value of one coefficient at a time.

§ 2. Let P Q R be the curve to be analysed. Let the base PŘ range from a=-1 to x=+1, and the equation to the curve in terms of a Fourier Series be

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

and {A, is the mean ordinate of the curve. The values of the other coefficients are given by

Communicated by the Physical Society: read March 8, 1895. † Phil. Mag. xxxviii., July 1894; also Catalogue of the Mathematical Exhibition at Munich (1892-93).

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

These are the integrals which any harmonic analyser has to evaluate. Now suppose we have a circular disk, centre K (fig. 1),

Fig. 1.

[graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed]

constrained to keep in contact with a straight line XX parallel to PR, and capable of rolling along X X without slip. Further, let X X be capable of motion in the plane in a vertical but not a horizontal direction, so that every point fixed in it describes a perpendicular to PR. Then we can make the point K trace out any arbitrary curve by moving X X and rolling the disk along it.

Bring K over P, and then mark any point D on the horizontal diameter at a distance from the centre (not necessarily inside the disk). Starting from P carry K right round PQR and back to P again by the motion just described. Supposing the circumference of the disk to be an aliquot part of P R, say 21/n, let us find the area of the curve traced out by D during this operation. As the disk turns

D through an angle 2nt in rolling along a length 21 of XX, it will turn through ntx/l in a distance x; so if x, y be the coordinates of K at some point on its journey, the corresponding coordinates of D will be

2 — r.cos nn. cos no, y+r. cos nn .sin no,

where, to fix the sign, we have assumed D to lie initially to the left of K and X X to lie above the disk, as in the figure. Hence the area traced out by D is

R, =Sydx-r.cos nasy d (cos 10)

+r.cos na sin n6 dx — »2 S sin n0 d (cos no). The last two integrals vanish on taking them round a closed curve. Nothing is added to either of the first two by continuing the integration from R back to P, as y is then zero. Therefore, calling the area of the whole curve P Q Ra, we have

+1 Ri=a + cos na

y sin no. dx.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]



Similarly, if D had been initially on the vertical instead of on the horizontal diameter, and below K, we should have had

+1 R=at cos nt.

y cos no. d..

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]


[ocr errors]


[ocr errors]

It will evidently be convenient to take r some multiple of 1/TT units of length, say 10. We then have, rewriting the last two equations,

when r=

R,=a + cos nt . 10nB.,

. (1) R, =a + cos nt . 101A

(2) Care must be taken with regard to the sign on the right-hand side if any other initial position of disk and line be assumed than that dealt with above.

§ 3. These two equations contain the whole theory of my instrument; they show how to construct a curve the area of which gives the required coefficients. The geometrical inechanism seems to me to be somewhat interesting, and to be possibly capable of generalization by the use of noncircular disks.

The area of the D-curve (in dealing with a material instrument) might be obtained in two ways. We might put a pencil through the disk at D, draw the curve, and integrate it afterwards : or we might attach the pointer of an integrator to D and let the integrating go on simultaneously with the following of the curve.

It is the latter alternative that I have adopted. The former method would have some advantages, but would be slow and would lead to mechanical difficulties.

« PreviousContinue »