Social Science Quarterly, Volume 66Southwestern Social Science Association and the University of Texas, 1985 - Political science Includes section "Book reviews." |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 76
Page 831
Since the group means show that the nonparticipant group is set apart from the participant groups , these coefficients indicate that the resource variables are in fact the most significant contributors to political action .
Since the group means show that the nonparticipant group is set apart from the participant groups , these coefficients indicate that the resource variables are in fact the most significant contributors to political action .
Page 834
scores indicate that the status of nonparticipants is considerably lower than that of the two participant groups . The score for the nonparticipant group differs from the other two groups by over 10 points .
scores indicate that the status of nonparticipants is considerably lower than that of the two participant groups . The score for the nonparticipant group differs from the other two groups by over 10 points .
Page 995
Finally , the interrelations of these groups and the societies of which they are a part are explored . To facilitate explanation of associational development , Meister constructs a typology of leadership roles - the militant ...
Finally , the interrelations of these groups and the societies of which they are a part are explored . To facilitate explanation of associational development , Meister constructs a typology of leadership roles - the militant ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Metropolitan Development and the Changing Journey to Work | 519 |
An Empirical | 533 |
The Regulatory Policy Cycle and the Airline Deregulation Movement | 552 |
Copyright | |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action analysis areas average candidates characteristics coefficients comparable competition concern consumer correlation decision demand determine differences differential discrimination distribution earnings economic effect election equation experience explain factors female findings greater groups human impact important included income increase indicate individuals industry influence institutional interest issues Journal labor force less major male Marxism mean measure Mexican American noted occupations organizations participation percent period political Political Science population positions present Press problems programs question regression relationship relative reported residents response Review rules sample scores significant Social Science Society Sociology status structure suggest Table Texas theory tion unemployment University urban values variables voting wage women workers York