Social Science Quarterly, Volume 66Southwestern Social Science Association and the University of Texas, 1985 - Political science Includes section "Book reviews." |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 87
Page 602
CLASS , STATUS , AND POWER STRUCTURES OF COMMUNITY ELITES : A COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY1 Albert HUNTER , Northwestern University Richard FRITZ , Northwestern University This research compares the structure of class , status , and power ...
CLASS , STATUS , AND POWER STRUCTURES OF COMMUNITY ELITES : A COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY1 Albert HUNTER , Northwestern University Richard FRITZ , Northwestern University This research compares the structure of class , status , and power ...
Page 603
Dimensions of Community Elite Structures : Class , Status , and Power Since Weber ( 1978 ) social scientists have come to view class , status , and power as three distinct dimensions of stratification . Weber very explicitly conceived ...
Dimensions of Community Elite Structures : Class , Status , and Power Since Weber ( 1978 ) social scientists have come to view class , status , and power as three distinct dimensions of stratification . Weber very explicitly conceived ...
Page 611
Results We present our results in their commonly canted Weberian order of class , status , and power , with a reminder that we are comparing structures among these three dimensions , and across the four communities . Class .
Results We present our results in their commonly canted Weberian order of class , status , and power , with a reminder that we are comparing structures among these three dimensions , and across the four communities . Class .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Metropolitan Development and the Changing Journey to Work | 519 |
An Empirical | 533 |
The Regulatory Policy Cycle and the Airline Deregulation Movement | 552 |
Copyright | |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action analysis areas average candidates characteristics coefficients comparable competition concern consumer correlation decision demand determine differences differential discrimination distribution earnings economic effect election equation experience explain factors female findings greater groups human impact important included income increase indicate individuals industry influence institutional interest issues Journal labor force less major male Marxism mean measure Mexican American noted occupations organizations participation percent period political Political Science population positions present Press problems programs question regression relationship relative reported residents response Review rules sample scores significant Social Science Society Sociology status structure suggest Table Texas theory tion unemployment University urban values variables voting wage women workers York