Social Science Quarterly, Volume 70Southwestern Social Science Association and the University of Texas, 1989 - Political science Includes section "Book reviews." |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 86
Page 591
... less likely to support the economy ( means = 13.2 and 14.5 ; p < .02 ) and more likely to support the environment ( means = 11.7 and 10.1 ; p < .03 ) than are homemakers . Again , no item or interaction accounts for significant variance ...
... less likely to support the economy ( means = 13.2 and 14.5 ; p < .02 ) and more likely to support the environment ( means = 11.7 and 10.1 ; p < .03 ) than are homemakers . Again , no item or interaction accounts for significant variance ...
Page 613
... less educated , lower income , and Baptist respondents are much less accepting of both blacks and Mexican Americans . Lower SES Anglos never get to an acceptance level of 1.0 for either blacks or Mexican Americans . Younger Anglos are ...
... less educated , lower income , and Baptist respondents are much less accepting of both blacks and Mexican Americans . Lower SES Anglos never get to an acceptance level of 1.0 for either blacks or Mexican Americans . Younger Anglos are ...
Page 832
... less supportive of integration . Jews and persons expressing no religious preference are more supportive of integration in the GSS analysis but not in the NES analysis though they are less likely to perceive blacks as a threat . The ...
... less supportive of integration . Jews and persons expressing no religious preference are more supportive of integration in the GSS analysis but not in the NES analysis though they are less likely to perceive blacks as a threat . The ...
Contents
Gender Role Stereotypes and Attitudes | 579 |
Discrimination and the Assimilation and Ethnic Competition Perspectives | 594 |
Some | 607 |
Copyright | |
1 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abortion action activity American analysis areas associated behavior benefits California cheating compared concern costs countries crime Department differences economic effect employment estimate ethnic examine example factors female findings forces freedom future gender greater groups growth higher Hispanic human important income increase indicate individual industry influence institutional interest issues Journal labor legislators less major male marriage means measure mental Mexican noted occupations Office organization origin participation patterns percent percentage persons points political population positive present Press problems prohibition Quarterly questions rates relative reported represent response Review role sample Science sector segregation shows significant social Social Science society Sociology Spanish status structure suggest Table Texas theory tion United University utilization variables women workers York