Social Science Quarterly, Volume 70Southwestern Social Science Association and the University of Texas, 1989 - Political science Includes section "Book reviews." |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 57
Page 672
... participation will . Hypothesis 2 : Distribution of Staff on Incongruence of Discretion and Participation HYPOTHESIS 2a : More staff will say they are deprived of discretion and participation than will say they have enough or too much ...
... participation will . Hypothesis 2 : Distribution of Staff on Incongruence of Discretion and Participation HYPOTHESIS 2a : More staff will say they are deprived of discretion and participation than will say they have enough or too much ...
Page 674
... participation . Items used to measure discretion and participation are shown in Table 1 . Congruence / incongruence was measured , following Alutto and Belasco ( 1972 ) and Conway ( 1976 ) , by asking respondents to indicate how much ...
... participation . Items used to measure discretion and participation are shown in Table 1 . Congruence / incongruence was measured , following Alutto and Belasco ( 1972 ) and Conway ( 1976 ) , by asking respondents to indicate how much ...
Page 677
... Participation incongruence fails to account for work quality perceptions . Most workers say they participate too little yet perceive a work quality level similar to those who participate enough . ( The worker who participated " too much ...
... Participation incongruence fails to account for work quality perceptions . Most workers say they participate too little yet perceive a work quality level similar to those who participate enough . ( The worker who participated " too much ...
Contents
Gender Role Stereotypes and Attitudes | 579 |
Discrimination and the Assimilation and Ethnic Competition Perspectives | 594 |
Some | 607 |
Copyright | |
1 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abortion action activity American analysis areas associated behavior benefits California cheating compared concern costs countries crime Department differences economic effect employment estimate ethnic examine example factors female findings forces freedom future gender greater groups growth higher Hispanic human important income increase indicate individual industry influence institutional interest issues Journal labor legislators less major male marriage means measure mental Mexican noted occupations Office organization origin participation patterns percent percentage persons points political population positive present Press problems prohibition Quarterly questions rates relative reported represent response Review role sample Science sector segregation shows significant social Social Science society Sociology Spanish status structure suggest Table Texas theory tion United University utilization variables women workers York