Social Science Quarterly, Volume 70Southwestern Social Science Association and the University of Texas, 1989 - Political science Includes section "Book reviews." |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 56
Page 669
... workers ' subjective evaluations of the excellence of work performed by their co - workers . Generally , we study workers ' perceptions of their co - workers ' ( 1 ) accuracy of knowledge and understanding ( of laws , regulations ...
... workers ' subjective evaluations of the excellence of work performed by their co - workers . Generally , we study workers ' perceptions of their co - workers ' ( 1 ) accuracy of knowledge and understanding ( of laws , regulations ...
Page 674
... workers ( see Table 1 ) . Workers with more discretion report that their coworkers ( r = .42 ; p < .001 ) and their supervisors ( r = .33 ; p < .001 ) perform higher quality work . This is not the case with supervisors , however ...
... workers ( see Table 1 ) . Workers with more discretion report that their coworkers ( r = .42 ; p < .001 ) and their supervisors ( r = .33 ; p < .001 ) perform higher quality work . This is not the case with supervisors , however ...
Page 680
... workers , and those with more of it say their co - workers do superior work . To insure that the organizational and societal resource that welfare workers represent is mined , workers ' discretion and participation quantity should be ...
... workers , and those with more of it say their co - workers do superior work . To insure that the organizational and societal resource that welfare workers represent is mined , workers ' discretion and participation quantity should be ...
Contents
Gender Role Stereotypes and Attitudes | 579 |
Discrimination and the Assimilation and Ethnic Competition Perspectives | 594 |
Some | 607 |
Copyright | |
1 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abortion action activity American analysis areas associated behavior benefits California cheating compared concern costs countries crime Department differences economic effect employment estimate ethnic examine example factors female findings forces freedom future gender greater groups growth higher Hispanic human important income increase indicate individual industry influence institutional interest issues Journal labor legislators less major male marriage means measure mental Mexican noted occupations Office organization origin participation patterns percent percentage persons points political population positive present Press problems prohibition Quarterly questions rates relative reported represent response Review role sample Science sector segregation shows significant social Social Science society Sociology Spanish status structure suggest Table Texas theory tion United University utilization variables women workers York