THE EDINBURGH REVIEW, OR CRITICAL JOURNAL: FOR JUNE 1826.... SEPTEMBER 1826. TO BE CONTINUED QUARTERLY. JUDEX DAMNATUR CUM NOCENS ABSOLVITUR. PUBLIUS SYRUS. VOL. XLIV. EDINBURGH: Printed by the Heirs of D. Willison, FOR ARCHIBALD CONSTABLE AND COMPANY, EDINBURGH : LONDON. 1826. CONTENTS OF No. LXXXVII. ART. I. Who Wrote Icon Basilike? By Christopher Words- worth, D. D. Master of Trinity College, Cambridge II. 1. The Gospel of St John, in Latin, adapted to the Hamiltonian System, by an Analytical and Inter- 2. The Gospel of St John, adapted to the Hamilto- nian System, by an Analytical and Interlineary Translation from the Italian, with full Instruc- tions for its Use, even by those who are wholly Page IV. A History of England, from the first Invasion of the Romans. By John Lingard, D. D. Vol. VII. and VIII. V. Mœurs Administratives, pour faire suite aux Observa- VI. Narrative of Travels and Discoveries in Northern and Central Africa, in the Years 1822, 1823, and 1824, by Major Denham, Captain Clapperton, and the late Doctor Oudney, extending across the Great Desert 94 the Fellatah Empire. With an Appendix, publish- ed by Authority of the Right Honourable Earl Bathurst, one of his Majesty's Principal Secretaries of State, and Dedicated by Permission to his Lord- ship. By Major Dixon Denham, of his Majesty's 17th Regiment of Foot, and Captain Hugh Clap- perton, of the Royal Navy, the Survivors of the Ex- VII. The Life and Remains of the Rev. Edward Daniel EDINBURGH REVIEW, JUNE, 1826. N°. LXXXVII. ART. I. Who Wrote Icon Basilike? By CHRISTOPHER WORDSWORTH, D.D. Master of Trinity College, Cambridge. London, 1824. A SUCCESSION of problems or puzzles in the literary and political history of modern times, has occasionally occupied some ingenious writers, and amused many idle readers. Those who think nothing useful which does not yield some palpable and direct advantage, have indeed scornfully rejected such inquiries, as frivolous and useless. But their disdain has not repressed such discussions-and it is fortunate that it has not. Amusement is itself an advantage. The vigour which the understanding derives from exercise on every subject, is a great advantage. If there be any utility in history, it must be very useful that it should be accurate-which it never will be, unless there be a solicitude to ascertain the truth even of its minutest parts. History is read with pleasure, and with moral effect, only so far as it engages our feelings in the merit or demerit, in the fame or fortune, of historical personages. If it did not excite such feelings, we should study it with the same coolness and tranquillity with which we study physical science. But in contemplating the fortunes of our fellow-creatures, in history, in fiction, or in real life, we are eager, we are intensely anxious to discover the guilt or innocence, the claims to eminence, or the events of the lives of those whose characters have excited in our minds strong feelings, whether friendly or adverse. Our interest in the history of past times is of the same nature with our sentiments on the matters that daily occur around us. The breathless anxiety with which the obscure and conflicting evidence on a trial at law is watched by the bystanders, is but a variety of the same feeling which prompts the reader of history to examine the proofs against Mary Queen of Scots, with as deep an interest as if she were alive, and were now on her trial. And it is wisely ordered A VOL. XLIV. No. 87. |