Page images
PDF
EPUB

"Mr. Bakewell the traveller," in opposition to the report which Dr. John Pye Smith was the organ of diffusing among the English religious public. Mr. Bakewell publishes extracts from the correspondence of a friend at Geneva, partly explaining, partly qualifying and denying. This matter is not new-it has been long since canvassed. And having never seen Mr. Bakewell's book, we must seek its character in some other source, and we rest with the deepest conviction of the accuracy of the verdict in the following notice-found in the Eclectic Review for April 1824-Review of Travels in Switzerland:-" Mr. Bakewell's whole statement we are compelled to say is a gross misrepresentation, not we believe a designed one, but arising out of misinformation received from his Genevese friends, added to his total ignorance of what Calvin taught, or Calvinists believe. His attack on that great man is in the coarsest style of Socinian virulence."-"His chief object seems to be to vent a certain portion of atrabilious feeling against the Genevese Reformer, and to hold up to ridicule Mr. Malan."

The plain question here is concerning the relative extent of knowledge and credibility of the varying correspondence. Now without a word about the lat ter, we would submit it to the Christian Examiner himself, whether he supposed Mr. Bakewell's correspondent as likely to be well informed as Dr. Smith's. If a riot were to happen at the North End, the inquest would not seek its witnesses on the Mall. We know that Dr. Smith had letters, as we have ourselves now lying by us, from such as suffered both reproach and hunger in these persecutions and who could not be mistaken in either their sensations or the

cause.

As to the defence of Professor Cheneviere, it is signally gratuitous on the part of the Examiner. None of the readers of the Spectator will suppose that one act of immorality, as the Christian Examiner would define it, attaches to his life. In a phraseology which seems to us sufficiently guarded, it is said that no man in the ranks of the Socinian Pastors less adorns his profession with a conversation apparently holy. The delicacy with which private character should be guarded is increased by distance and strangership and the Christian Spectator is above the reproach of transgressing this law which every honorable mind feels. But the moral influence of Unitarianism upon the lives of its professors, is a question vital to our knowledge of the truth or falsehood of the whole system. How is pagan land known from Christian land but by its morals. The word "holy," has come to have a distinct meaning, and to express practical conformity to Christian morals. If we should say that after preaching a dedication sermon, it was not holy practice to take the steam-boat for Boston on the Sabbath, we should scarcely be misunderstood; but if we should say such a person was immoral, it would convey an impression wide of the truth. Thus card-playing, dancing, with the common et ceteras of this world, while entirely moral at Geneva, are scarcely esteemed holy any where; and we leave it to the responsible authority," which sustains the defence of the Examiner, to say whether the Professor would have gained if the Reviewer, in the place of using an exact adjective, had thrown in any suppletory matter. While all attacks on private life are carefully to be forborne, the life of a man, whose sole profession it is to circulate religious knowledge-who draws his salary through forms of organization created and conse secrated by the wisdom and piety of Calvinists, may at least deserve a passing glance.

As to the persecutions in the Canton de Vaud, the Reviewer could scarcely be ignorant-as he professes to have personal acquaintance with the facts-that Unitarians, strictly speaking, did not make them. He deserves censure for heedlessness, if he leaves such an impression: however, all the clergy of Lau sanne, are not eminently Trinitarian. The events in that Canton only exhibit the league always discoverable between the enemies of revivals of religion, whatever be the discrepancy of their peculiar creed.

Erratum.-Last No. p. 295, col. 2. line fourth from the bottom, instead of passage read paper.

[blocks in formation]

THE IMPORTANCE OF MULTIPLYING And although I deem it somewhat THE LABORS OF WELL QUALIFIED

AND FAITHFUL EVANGELISTS.

(Concluded from page 340.)

Ir is my design in this paper to conclude, for the present, the observations I had undertaken to make, upon this subject.

And, first, I shall attend to the question: How are evangelists to be obtained? To which, generally, I answer, Let the providence of God point them out. There is no single undertaking, in the wide range of Christian enterprise, for which a Board of human supervision would prove more utterly incompetent to select the candidates, beforehand, than for this. If there be any thing, in which the providence of God utterly contemns the providence of man, it is here. All that we can do, as instruments, is, to bring this subject fairly before the Christian world, and if possible, to make its importance duly appreciated. Then might we hope, that those spirits, whom God shall stir up to such a work, will begin to try themselves.

hazardous to undertake the office of advice upon a subject the secrets of which I have already announced as being shut up in the hollow of God's own hand, I will yet humbly and modestly deliver some of my own impressions.

I have formed an opinion, that it would be well for him, whose heart is moved to such a work, to make the humblest and smallest beginnings in the most retired circumstances, without any pretensions, and without disclosing his object. The world is full of sinners, that may be found and collected any where, by him who is properly authorised to preach the gospel; or, if you please, by a young candidate for the ministry, who is beginning to make experiment of his gifts, in some humble way. It is by the success of small beginnings, under the blessing of God, that the true servant of Christ, engaged in such a work, will find his gifts improving, will be encouraged to increase his efforts, and to extend his fields of labor. He may be the instrument of a revival of religion. This will call him forth into a still larger field, will make him more conspicuous, and his influence will be greatly extended. By which time 50 he will need great humility, much

I say try themselves. For it is only by actual and protracted experiment, that the proper character of an evangelist can be determined. VOL. II.-No. VIII.

prayer, and a deep sense of his dependence on God.

And so let him go on from week to week, from month to month, from year to year, and from place to place, till his character is established; until he can humbly say, as an apostle, "I can do all things through Christ, who strengtheneth me." With a becoming humility, by prayer, and with an ever cherished sense of his dependence, he will not fail to prosper. But if at any time he becomes elated and giddy with success, the blasting of God will be upon him.

I throw out these thoughts merely as a collection of hints on that course of training, which I conceive is, in some manner, essential to a candidate for the office of an evangelist. It is nothing but the providence of God, crowning his labors with protracted success, in the actual field, that can place the seal of this high character upon his commission. The evangelist may come directly from the schools, after suitable training, or he may be found already trained in the field of pastoral labor. But the providence of God, in connexion with his own purposes of heart, only can point him out. It is impossible he should be recommended before he is proved; and proved in a manner to be held in reputation by all the churches. The office of an evangelist may doubtless be sustained for a season, and then resigned; though a "good proof," in such ministry might seem to be a call for the consecration of life, as sacred as to the object of a mission among the heathen.

The proper qualifications of an evangelist are worthy of engaging a few thoughts. It is supposed, of course, that he is strongly inclined to the work, that he is bent upon it with a high and holy purpose, that cannot well be turned away,-that he is wishing for the salvation of souls, and for the more rapid extension of the kingdom of Christ, to undertake a life of severe labor, great

self-denial, and sacrifice,--and to cast himself on the providence of God, and the charities of a Christian community, to accept gratefully such countenance and support, as he may receive, and to endure patiently such rebukes and trials, as he may have to encounter. For, favorable as I conceive is the state of the Christian community, in our country, and of the general character of the people, to such a work, it would doubtless be an illusion to expect exemption from trials.

In answering the question: How are evangelists to be obtained? we have settled one of the grandest and highest qualifications, and itself prin cipal, viz. the actual experience of success. And though with such a recommendation, we would not dare to lift our hand against any man's continuance in this work, yet I conceive it possible, that such a man should have about him a great many accidental and unnecessary defects. And there is even danger, that a man's success in the ministry should sanctify his faults. Personal qualifications, which long experience has commended, for giving access to human hearts, ought never to be despised. Some of those I shall name, I propose rather as desirable, than indispensable.

Among the external circumstances, it seems to me obvious and important, that an evangelist should be free from pecuniary embarrassment; that he should be unencumbered of any worldly connexions, that would disturb, or forbid such an enterprise. There are but few men with a family incumbent, that could conveniently devote themselves to this work. Though, I confess, it is difficult to decide this question, except upon general considerations. There are few enterprises of a worldly character, dear to men, which will not compel the accomodation of all domestic circumstances and relations. And why, it may be asked, may they not sometimes yield to

such an object as this, so long as the moral integrity of a man's duty to his family is maintained? The worldly estate of a family is of little consequence, while they are comfortable and happy. And surely a minister of the gospel, intent upon his proper work, can never promise his family a high degree of thriving for this world.

But I was about to notice some personal qualifications. Among which, I think it will be admitted, that an acquaintance with the world, with human nature, and those accomplishments in manners, which give freedom of access to all men and to all hearts, are very desirable. As a specimen of this character, I think I may mention a living example, (as examples are always most persuasive,) that is too far off probably to be either offended or flattered by such a notice; and an example too, well known and directly in point. I mean that of Joseph Wolf, the converted Jew, and at present an evangelist, having declined his salary from the Missionary Society. He somewhere states in his admirable Journal, (while in Egypt, I think,) a sentiment equivalent to this: that he meant to show to the world, that it is possible to preach the gospel any where without giving personal offence. He also disclaims the right of the ministers of Christ, and maintains it as the Messiah's exclusive prerogative, to administer such rebuke in the face of men, as is thundered out in the awful concatenation of woes denounced against the Scribes and Pharisees. As I speak from distant recollection, and have not the book at hand, I shall hope I have not done my authority injustice. I am sure, quite indeed, that I have

not.

Whether Mr. Wolf be right or wrong in his positions, I confess myself an unqualified admirer of his manner. And his unexampled success in gaining access to human hearts, in every country, of every

religion, and of every sect, producing conviction of truth, and securing per. sonal esteem, ought surely to commend his principles and his conduct in this particular. I do not fear to propose this man as a safe and high pattern to be copied by every evangelist, and by every Christian minister. It must be confessed, such distinguished suavity of disposition, and consequently of manner, is very much a gift of nature. And it should also be recollected, that the incessant and untiring culture of any virtue, will give it a respectable and.commanding prominence.

I did not intend to make so much of this single qualification. Although, perhaps, it is well enough, as there is sometimes too great a propensity, in the religious zeal of our country, to bear down, and in that way to create opposition, by severity of manner. Some, indeed, have adopted the principle, that the greater the opposition, the greater the hope of good. And this is true, just so far as opposition represents only the conflict of the depraved heart with divine truth. But opposition provoked only by the manner of representing truth, and holding that manner alone the object of hatred is a great misfortune; and instead of being likely to conduct to a happy result, can hardly fail to leave the subject two fold more the child of hell. It arms the opposer with a prejudice, that is most undesirable, and most momentous. His chance of being subdued by the power of truth, at any future time is greatly, infinitely diminished. If it be possible, the adversary will forever hold him in this unhappy thraldom. That, doubtless, is the most felicitous way of preaching the gospel, which makes the sinner most dissatisfied with himself, and urges him on to the cross of Christ.

A man of great zeal, and of a severe, denouncing manner, combining little of the character of a "son of consolation," may, doubtless, produce a good moral effect,

in any department of the Christian ministry. He may be the instrument of awakening and converting a great many sinners. But we ought not hence to conclude, that this is the happiest way, and to be imitated by others;-nor that such a man would not be more extensively useful, if he combined a greater versatility of talent. A single talent can hit only a single class of people. All other classes will be excluded from the sphere of its influence. And if this talent happen to be of a severe cast, obnoxious to those whom it cannot reduce by its violence, it will of course, in so public a character as a minister of the gospel who is actively engaged before the world, raise an army of prejudice, and shut up forever the door of access to by far the largest portion of the community. I think, therefore, it ought to be made a matter of conscience with every minister of the gospel, not only to possess and exhibit as far as possible, a firmness and decision of character, an intrepidity of enterprise, in the maintenance and declaration of divine truth, in all his dealing with souls; but that he should also manifest the meekness of the man of Galilee, the gentleness of that religion, which was born in heaven, and is it self as soft as the manners of heaven. And more than all ministers does the evangelist need this character.

Although there is sufficient proof in the history of the church, that God will "make foolish the wisdom of this world, and bring to nought the understanding of the prudent;" although men of the most slender accomplishments in human lore, have sometimes been most highly honored, as instruments, in building up and extending the kingdom of Christ; yet, it would probably be found, if all the facts could be disclosed, that they were in themselves master spirits; that their intellectual vigor found full scope in the wide range and illimitable fields of divine revelation;that, if they did not understand the grammar, they felt and

spoke the soul of language. Enough of Bible truth to occupy the intellect and fill the heart of any man, not only through life, but through eternal ages, stands prominent upon the very face of any version of tolerable fidelity, that has ever been made. While, therefore, we can easily account for the amazing prowess which some godly men, uninstructed in human science, have wielded over human hearts, by "the sword of the Spirit," these very facts should satisfy us, how much more these same men would have accomplished, by the same zeal, had they been able, like the apostle of the Gentiles, to stand up the peers of all around them in the lore of this world. They were yet men of learning-men of study, though their library was the book of God.

It will be apparent to the reader, that I have intended to apply this argument to the qualifications of evangelists;-especially, that as far as possible, and as many of them as possible, should be well versed in what is technically denominated Biblical learning. Did I not feel, that I am already extending this article to a tedious length, I should say more on this point. As the apostle said to Timothy, "let no man despise thy youth,' so is it desirable, that no man should be able to despise the literary qualifications of an evangelist. Learning very extensively is becoming common property among the people of our land. And it would be a great misfortune to an evangelist, as well as to any clergyman, and subtract much from his respect and influence, that his hearers should be able to go home and sayhe is low and vulgar in his language.'

As to the fields, in which it is most expedient for evangelists to labor, I would observe generally, that if a minister of Christ would spend his life where he can have the least influence, with a given amount of fidelity and labor,-where the people can go on peaceably together down

« PreviousContinue »