Death of a Generation: How the Assassinations of Diem and JFK Prolonged the Vietnam War
When John F. Kennedy was shot, millions were left to wonder how America, and the world, would have been different had he lived to fulfill the enormous promise of his presidency. For many historians and political observers, what Kennedy would and would not have done in Vietnam has been a source of enduring controversy.Now, based on convincing new evidence--including a startling revelation about the Kennedy administration's involvement in the assassination of Premier Diem--Howard Jones argues that Kennedy intended to withdraw the great bulk of American soldiers and pursue a diplomatic solution to the crisis in Vietnam.Drawing upon recently declassified hearings by the Church Committee on the U.S. role in assassinations, newly released tapes of Kennedy White House discussions, and interviews with John Kenneth Galbraith, Robert McNamara, Dean Rusk, and others from the president's inner circle, Jones shows that Kennedy firmly believed that the outcome of the war depended on the South Vietnamese. In the spring of 1962, he instructed Secretary of Defense McNamara to draft a withdrawal plan aimed at having all special military forces home by the end of 1965. The "Comprehensive Plan for South Vietnam" was ready for approval in early May 1963, but then the Buddhist revolt erupted and postponed the program. Convinced that the war was not winnable under Diem's leadership, President Kennedy made his most critical mistake--promoting a coup as a means for facilitating a U.S. withdrawal. In the cruelest of ironies, the coup resulted in Diem's death followed by a state of turmoil in Vietnam that further obstructed disengagement. Still, these events only confirmed Kennedy's view about South Vietnam's inability to win the war and therefore did not lessen his resolve to reduce the U.S. commitment. By the end of November, however, the president was dead and Lyndon Johnson began his campaign of escalation. Jones argues forcefully that if Kennedy had not been assassinated, his withdrawal plan would have spared the lives of 58,000 Americans and countless Vietnamese.Written with vivid immediacy, supported with authoritative research, Death of a Generation answers one of the most profoundly important questions left hanging in the aftermath of John F. Kennedy's death.
Counterinsurgency in South Vietnam Averting a Quagmire
Democracy at Bay Diem as Mandarin
Counteraction to Counterinsurgency The Military Solution
Waging a Secret War
Subterfuge in the Delta
The Strange Seduction of Vietnam
A Decent Veil of Hypocrisy
DeAmericanizing the Secret War
The Fire This Time
The Road to a Coup
At the Brink of a Coup Again
Toward a Partial Withdrawal
President Kennedys Decision to Withdraw
Fall of the House of Ngo
The Tragedy of JFK
Other editions - View all
Death of a Generation: How the Assassinations of Diem and JFK Prolonged the ...
No preview available - 2003
action advisers American army ARVN assassination asserted Buddhists Chiefs of Staff combat troops Communist Conein counterinsurgency Countries—Vietnam coup declared defense Diem and Nhu Diem regime Diem's forces Forrestal FRUS Galbraith Gilpatric Gravel guerrilla Halberstam Hanoi Harkins Harriman Hilsman ibid infiltration insisted insurgency JFKL Johnson joint chiefs June Kennedy administration Kennedy in Vietnam Kennedy's Lansdale Laos LBJL leaders Lodge to Rusk Madame Nhu McGeorge Bundy McNamara meeting memo of conversation ment Minh National Nhu's Nolting to Rusk North officers Oral History Interview pagoda Pentagon Papers political President Kennedy president's Rostow Saigon Saigon embassy Saigon government SEATO Sept seventeenth parallel South Vietnam Southeast Asia Strategic Hamlet Program strategic hamlets Taylor Thuan tion Trueheart to Rusk U.S. combat U.S. Government U.S. military U.S. troops United Vietcong Vietnam August-December 1963 Vietnam January-August 1963 Vietnam War Vietnamese warned Washington White House withdrawal
Page 8 - To those people in the huts and villages of half the globe struggling to break the bonds of mass misery we pledge our best efforts to help them help themselves, for whatever period is required, not because the Communists may be doing it, not because we seek their votes, but because it is right. If a free society cannot help the many who are poor it cannot save the few who are rich.