. The Apostles ideas of the nature and duration of the Messiah's Kingdom, considered p. 168 to 171. Proofs that the Apostles did not expect the end of the world in their own time, from the Bishop of Landaff, and from Mr. Thomas · 172, 173. The Apostle's language very strong upon this subject 173 Many examples of a similar strength of language drawn from the Old Testament, when temporal calamities only were predicted 174, 175. Probability that this language was applied to the destruction of Jerusalem, as that event had not taken place, when the Apostles wrote their Epistles 175. This language peculiarly proper in the Apostles as Jews-as pious and good men, and as men who had every thing to fear from the malevolence of their Adversaries 176 Case of Mr. Brothers, remarkably applicable to the conduct of the Apostles. Note. ibid. The phrase the coming of Christ, sometimes used to denote the destruction of Jerusalem. This acknowledged by all Commentators 176 to 178. Bishop Hallifax, Dr. Benson, and Dr. Macknight, quoted to prove this 176, &c. A remarkable passage of Bishop Newton on the nature of Epistolary Writings, well worth attention, in considering the Epistles 179, 180. The Fifth Chapter of the First Epistle to the Thessalonians examined 180. Its supposed connection with the close of the Fourth Chapter considered ibid. The meaning of the expression we who are alive, , examined 181, 182. The . . The expressions we and us applied, in Scripture, to those who live in distant ages--Proofs of this from Bishop Horne, and Dr. Benson p. 181, 182. The Fifth Chapter allowed to have a close con nection with the xxivth of Matthew 184. The meaning of the phrase the times and the seasons, examined.-Inconsistencies of commentators on this subject 185 to 188, Inconsistencies of Commentators in explaining the subsequent part of the chapter 189, 190. Remarkable passages of Bishop Newton, and the Bishop of Landaff, upon the injudicious quotation of Scripture 190, 191. St. Paul's celebrated chapter on the Man of Sin, considered • 193. The phrase the coming of Christ, considered and compared with Matthew xxiv. and parallel chap ters. The resemblance very striking 194. Bishop Newton's objections to the application of the coming of Christ to the destruction of Jeru salem, stated and considered 195 to 198. Remarkable quotation from Dr. Edwards on Bishop Newton's idea of the Day being at hand 197 Nature of the Apostasy, and the opinion of learn. ed Men stated.--Criticism upon its genuine meaning-considered abstractedly, it means, a departure from any thing-requires an addis tion to ascertain the meaning of the Writeras, Apostasy from Moses from the faith-from the living God 199, 200, Christ's describing the rising of Nation against Nation referred to the Apostasy, mentioned by 201. Josephus, C 2 Josephus, in describing the causes of the destruc tion of Jerusalem, uses the term Apostasy 203. The phrase the Man of Sin, applied to the Jewish Nation-their flagitious character. Remarkable passages of Josephus and Dr. Beattie to this purpose pages 205 to 207. Curious passage of Bishop Hurd upon the Character of the Bishops of Rome 208. What is meant by the Man of Sin exalting himself above all that is called God, Dr. Benson's, Bishop Hallifax's, Dr. Duchal's, and Bishop Newton's opinion stated 208, 209. The Jews aspiring to universal dominion, applied to St. Paul's description of the Man of Sin op, posing and exalting himself above all that is called God 210, 211. Spiritual Tyranny of the Jewish Rulers---various instances of it-not surpassed by the Church of Rome. 212, &c. What with-held the Revelation of the Man of Sin -known to the Thessalonians, Inconsistency of Bishop Hallifax 214. Dr. Whitby's opinion stated-well worth attention 215, &c. Remarks upon 216. Dr. Whitby with Dr. Lightfoot, refers the Mystery of Iniquity to the Jewish Nation 217. What is meant by the brightness of his coming [217 to 219. The working of Satan with all power and signs, and lying wonders, &c. referred by Commentators, to Christ's prediction of false Christs, &c. shewing great signs and wonders 220. Remarkable . . Remarkable passage from Mr. Kett 221. What is meant by the term Traditions ibid. Judicious observations of Dr. Paley and Dr. Lard ner, upon the time of the publication of the Gospels. While they remained unpublished, the predictions of Christ properly Traditions 222-3. Mr. Zouch's account of the application of St. Paul's Man of Sin to various personages 224. Mr. Jones applies it to the late Revolution in France 224. Approved of by Mr. Kett 225, Bishop Horsley of opinion that this portentous power is yet to rise-or is only now risinglikewise approved by Mr. Kett ibid. Application of St. Paul's Man of Sin to any other than the Jewish Nation, has a tendency to injure instead of serving the cause of Chris tianity The term Antichrist used no where in the Sacred Writings but in the Two Epistles of St. John 226. Of the time when these Epistles were written [226, 267. Mr.Pyle, Dr.Benson, Dr. Macknight, Archbishop Newcome, and Dr. Prettyman, of opinion that it was written before the destruction of Jerusalem 227, 228. All of them refer the appearance of Antichrist to our Lord's Prophecy of false Christs and false Prophets, &c. ibid. Bound, by the laws of sound criticism, to inter pret the word Antichrist solely of them. 229. Bishop Hurd, though of the same opinion with Mr. Pyle, &c. &c. applies it to the reign of Anti christ, 225, 226. Criticism on the word Apostasy recommended to The present Bishop of London's Character of Character of our Lord stated by Mr. Maltby 262. Admitted, by all descriptions of men, to be most 262, &c. . ERRATA. In Page 1 line 6 from the bottom, instead of, in their behaviour, read, in the behaviour of his opponents to be, &c. 5 line 18 of the Note, read, metaphysical questions ; instead of metaphysical disquisition questions ; 9 The inverted commas to the last nine lines of the Note should have been omitted 34 line 23, rcad, kingdom of Heaven, instead of kingdom Heaven. 35 29, read, Mosaic, instead of Mosiac as an History |