The Rush to Policy: Using Analytic Techniques in Public Sector Decision Making

Front Cover

Rush to Policy explores the appropriate role of technical analysis in policy formulation. The authors ask when and how the use of sophisticated analytic techniques in decision-making benefits the nation. They argues that these techniques are too often used in situations where they may not be needed or understood by the decision maker, where they may not be to answer the questions raised but are nonetheless required by law.

House and Shull provide an excellent empirical base for describing the impact of politics on policies, policy analysis, and policy analysts. They examine cost-benefit analysis, risk analysis, and decision analysis and assess their ability to substitute for the current decision-making process in the public sector. They examine the political basis of public sector decision-making, how individuals and organizations make decisions, and the ways decisions are made in the federal sector. Also, they discuss the mandate to use these methods in the policy formulation process.

The book is written by two practicing federal policy analysts who, in a decade of service as policy researchers, developed sophisticated quantitative analytic and decision-making techniques. They then spent several years trying to use them in the real world. Success and failures are described in illuminating detail, providing insight not commonly found in such critiques. The authors delineate the interaction of politics and technical issues. Their book describes policy analysis as it is, not how it ought to be.

Peter W. House is the director of policy research and analysis at the National Science Foundation. He is the author of ten books on multidisciplinary science and technology policy research and analyses in government, private, and university sectors, including The Art of Public Policy Analysis and with Roger D. Shull, Regulatory Reform: Politics and the Environment and Regulations and Science: Management of Research on Demand.

Roger D. Shull is a senior analyst at the Division of Policy Research and Analysis, National Science Foundation.

 

What people are saying - Write a review

User Review - Flag as inappropriate

at SAPIC. I am currently a student at Purdue University Northwest and will be graduating in Fall 2018 with a Mechatronics Engineering Technology degree. I'm very interested in joining your team and applying my creativity and focus to an impressive company like SAPIC.
I believe that my academic background and training has prepared me perfectly for this position. While a student at Purdue University Northwest, I had the opportunity to learn a number of valuable skills such as PLC programing, CAD Autodesk software’s, and C++ programing that will undoubtedly contribute to my
 

Contents

Scope Concepts Methods
1
Policy Predicaments
13
Policymaking Responses
47
Potentials of Policymaking as an AdversityHandling Mode
73
Policy Principles for Handling Adversity
101
Required Policymaking Qualities versus Incapacities
115
Policymaking Specifications Realities Deficits
139
Needed Breakthroughs in Policy Sciences
219
Approaches to Policymaking Redesign
241
Recommendations for Policymaking Improvement
279
References
301
Reference Index
403
Subject Index
435
Copyright

Common terms and phrases

Bibliographic information