Pearl Harbor: The Verdict of HistoryTHE CONTROVERSIAL SEQUEL TO AT DAWN WE SLEPT -- A PROBING ANALYSIS OF THE ROOT CAUSES OF PEARL HARBOR, AMERICA'S MOST CATASTROPHIC MILITARY DEFEATThe monumental bestseller At Dawn We Slept was a landmark re-creation of the apocalyptic events of December 7, 1941. This provocative sequel delves even further to examine the underlying causes of Pearl Harbor and the revisionist theories that Roosevelt and other high officials knew about the attack.With the same imposing scholarship and narrative drive that distinguished its predecessor, Pearl Harbor uncovers the secret roles played by the president, his cabinet secretaries, admirals, and generals in the weeks before the attack. Based on more than forty years of research, extensive interviews, and an insider's knowledge of the military, this book poses an explosive and highly convincing new theory of America's entry into the Pacific War. Like the very best works of history, it not only expands but dramatically deepens our understanding of the events that were once the province of myth and rumor. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 47
Page 324
... Safford's accuracy , and agreed to be a witness in his behalf . This was during the congressional hearings . But a few days later Briggs's commanding officer ordered him not to confer with Safford again , and not to appear as a witness ...
... Safford's accuracy , and agreed to be a witness in his behalf . This was during the congressional hearings . But a few days later Briggs's commanding officer ordered him not to confer with Safford again , and not to appear as a witness ...
Page 327
... Safford , he might be sworn is as a witness . " The fact that we did not agree in all matters would become known and it would damage him . " 66 Safford ended his description of the receipt of the alleged “ exe- cute " in dramatic style ...
... Safford , he might be sworn is as a witness . " The fact that we did not agree in all matters would become known and it would damage him . " 66 Safford ended his description of the receipt of the alleged “ exe- cute " in dramatic style ...
Page 328
... Safford said that he " was referring to the War and Navy Departments in general , but not to any specific individual that I can identify . " His letter also stated that he had “ overwhelming proof ” of the guilt of Naval Operations and ...
... Safford said that he " was referring to the War and Navy Departments in general , but not to any specific individual that I can identify . " His letter also stated that he had “ overwhelming proof ” of the guilt of Naval Operations and ...
Contents
We Were All Out There | 3 |
Too Deeply to Bury Their Hate | 34 |
To Avoid War with Japan | 66 |
Copyright | |
31 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Pearl Harbor: The Verdict of History Gordon W. Prange,Donald M. Goldstein,Katherine V. Dillon Limited preview - 2014 |
Common terms and phrases
action Admiral Kimmel air attack aircraft alert American Army and Navy Army Board asked August Barnes believed Bloch bomb plot British carriers Chapter Chief of Staff China Congress congressional committee considered Dawn We Slept December defense Diary diplomatic dispatch East enemy fact failure Gerow going Government Hart Hawaii Hawaiian Department hereafter cited Honolulu Husband E Ibid intelligence intercepts Interview Islands January Japan Japanese Japanese attack Kimmel and Short knew Knox Konoye MacArthur Marshall military Morgan Nagumo nation Naval District Navy Court Navy Department Nomura November 27 Oahu officer operation peace Pearl Harbor attack Philippines planes position possible President radar RADM reconnaissance replied responsibility Roberts Commission Roosevelt sabotage Safford Secretary Senator ships situation Stark Stimson strategy submarine surprise task force testified thought Tokyo told Turner U.S. Navy U.S. Pacific Fleet United War Department warning Washington winds execute wrote Yamamoto York