T HE enfuing Treatife was firft publifh'd about the Year 1657, and fo well accepted, that within about two Years Time it paffed three Editions. The Author, a zealous Proteftant and Lover of Liberty, was excited to write on this Subject, by the numerous Complaints of the People, at that Time labouring under severe Profecutions for Tithes. For although the Power and Jurifdiction of the Ecclefiaftical Courts, to which Profecu→ tions for Tithes were limited by an Act made in the 32d Year of King Henry the Eighth, had been taken away, and the Bishops and their Clergy removed; yet the fucceeding Preachers, equally mindful of their own Intereft, foon obtained an Order of Parliament for fettling themselves pro tempore, dated the 2d of October 1644, and an Ordinance for Tithes dated the 8th of November following; under the heavy Burden of which the People in vain continued to exprefs great Unea finess : A 2 For For, when several Years after, upon Cromwell's being made Protector, one of the Articles of Government, by him fworn to and fubfcribed, did exprefs, that as foon as may be a Provifion lefs fubject to Scruple and Contention, and more certain than the prefent, be made for the En- couragement and Maintenance of able and painful Teachers, a Claufe was inferted therein, that until fuch Provifion be made, the prefent Maintenance (viz. by Tithes] fhall not be taken away nor impeached. By which Claufe, the Preachers, fecure of the Continuance of the old Pay, fat down at Eafe, profecuting fuch as refused to pay them Tithes, both in the Courts at Westminster, and before the Justices of the Peace in the Country, with such ex- treme Severity, that our Author has taken a particular Notice of it, and pathetically de- feribed fome of their unmerciful Exactions, After he has given an Extract, or short Hiftory of Tithes, from the firft Appointment of them by the Law of Mofes, taken chiefly from the Hiftory of Tithes by the learned Antiquary John Selden, he then confiders the feveral Claims made to them; as first, By divine Right; fecondly, By the Gifts of Kings and Princes; thirdly, By the Laws of Kings and Parliaments; fourthly, By particular Gifts, Appropriations, Confecration, and Do- nation of the Owners of the Land; fifthly, of of which Claims he returns a particular But, As the Author has not been fo full in his Remarks on Impropriate Tithes, nor fo copious in his Answers to the Arguments of thofe who plead for the divine Right of Tithes, as he might have been, for which latter he gives this Reafon; Though divine Right, fays he, hath been long pretended, few are now left who will only fand to it, and the Generality, both of Lawyers, Priefts and People, are of a con- trary Mind. pag. 31. Wherefore for the Sake ift. A Difcourfe of Impropriate Tithes, 2d. Reafons given by Thomas Bennett, an 3d. Some Arguments against Tithes, ex- 4th. In Conclufion, we have added a few Extracts from a Tract, under the Title of An Anfwer to the Country-Parfon's Plea against the Quakers Tithe-Bill, by a Member of the Houfe of Commons; wherein a pretended legal Property in Tithes, fo much infifted on by Having laid before the Reader these Hints Yet as from this Plea, fome, not of our And though a divine Right to Tithes is by pear. { pear. We are to confider then, and judge of the Confiftence or Inconfiftence of the Conduct of any Member of our Society in this particular, as we would of the Conduct of any Proteftant Diffenter on the Principle of Liberty and Confcience; who, on Pretence of being determined by an outward Law, acts contrary to his own profeffed Principles. There is a Language, and much stronger, in Actions than in Words. Every one who pays Tithes to a National Miniftry, by that Act, feems to declare his Belief that they are, by the Constitution of the Chriftian Church, due to that Ministry, antecedent to any National Law, and that it is truly and properly a Gofpel Ministry, whether of this or any other National Church; because not only the Law by which they are recovered, but the Parfon: who claims them, takes all this for granted. For can it be fuppofed he will plead a Right to Tithes, without declaring himself to have this Right as a Minifter of Chrift? From whence this fhameful Abfurdity undeniably follows, that every Man, under the Profeffion of Quakerifm, who pays Tithes, either profeffes what he does not believe, or believes what he does not practise. For, The Basis of our Religion is the univerfal Manifestation and immediate Teaching of the holy Spirit ;-from which arifes a Faith, that all acceptable Worship is performed in and under its Influence ;-that all Gospel Ministry flows from its Emanations ;-that this in Vel fels. |