Alexandra Printing Ink Company (Limited), re......
Allhusen and another v. Melgarejo (37 L. J. 169,
Q. B.; 3 L. Rep., Q. B. 340) ·

Alliance Bank, ex parte; re The Xeres Wine Com-
pany (Limited) (37 L. J. 415, Ch.)............_177 671
Ames v. Colnaghi (37 L. J. 159, C. P.; L. Rep.,
3 C. P. 359)..........

327

188

Anderson Anderson (37 L. J. 64, Prob. & Mat.)... 371
Anonymous (an insolvent), re
Appeal between Joseph Watson (app.) and the Church-
wardens, &c., of the parish of Hessle (resps.)...... 556
Arranging Trader, An, re...
Ashbury's case, re Smith, Knight, and Company 45
Ashby (app.) v. Harris (resp.) (37 L. J. 280, C. P.;
164 Mag. Cas.; L. Rep., 3 C. P. 523)

Attorney-General v. Bunce

....

Attorney-General v. Dakin and others (37 L. J. 150,

64

Betts v. Neilson and others (37 L. J. 321, Ch.;
L. Rep., 3 Ch. App. 429).........................
Bickerstaffe, re, ex parte Roche

Birt v. Boutinez (falsely called Birt) (37 L. J. 50,
Prob. & Mat.; L. Rep., 1 Prob. & Div. 487)...... 586
Blackborne v. Blackborne....

450 Blackmore v. Mills (falsely called Blackmore).. ......... 586 Blakely Ordnance Company (Limited), re; re The Claim of the New Zealand Banking Corporation (Limited) (37 L. J. 418, Ch.)...................................... Bland v. Bland and Stormont

......

719

742

Ex.; L. Rep, 3 Ex. 288)..

829

132

.....

535

383)

Avern v. Lloyd (37 L. J. 489, Ch.; L. Rep., 5 Ch.

282

Bookham v. Potter; ex parte Rogers (an attorney)

Avery v. Griffin.......

849

Ayles v. The South Eastern Railway Company (37 L. J. 104, Ex.; L. Rep., 3 Ex. 146)

B.

3 C. P. 286, 538,).

904

Bramble v. Moss (37 L. J. 209, C. P.; L. Rep.,

Baker, ex parte, ship “Isis,” re ................

241

5 CL. 420)

Barge's case, re Oriental Commercial Bank (L. Rep.,