« PreviousContinue »
"Painful aro repeated births.
0 house-builder! I have seen thee,
Thou canst not build again a house for me.
Thy rafters are broken
Thy roof-timbers are shattered,
My mind is detached,
1 have attained to tho extinction of desiro."
Whether the Buddhists receive the full Hindu doctrine of the migration of the individual soul from birth to birth, or whether they refine away into metaphysical subtleties the notion of continued personality, they do consistently and systematically hold that a man's life in former existences is the cause of his now being what he is, while at this moment he is accumulating merit or demerit whose result will determine his fate in future lives. Memory, it is true, fails generally to recal these past births, but memory, as we know, stops short of the beginning even of this present life. When King Bimsara's feet were burned and rubbed with salt by command of his cruel son that he might not walk, why was this torture inflicted on a man so holy? Because in a previous birth he had walked near a dagoba with his slippers on, and had trodden on a priest's carpet without washing his feet. A man may be prosperous for a time on account of the merit he has received in former births, but if he does not continue to keep the precepts, his next birth will be in one of the hells, he will then be born in this world as a beast, afterwards as a preta or sprite; a proud man may be born again ugly with large lips, or as a demon or a worm. The Buddhist theory of "karma" or "action," which controls the destiny of all sentient beings, not by judicial reward and punishment, but by the inflexible result of cause into effect, wherein the present is ever determined by the past in an unbroken line of causation, is indeed one of the world's most remarkable developments of ethical speculation.1
1 Koppen, 'Religion des Buddha,' vol. i. pp. 35, 289, etc., 318 ; Barthelemy Saint-Hilaire, 'he Bouddha et sa Religion,' p. 122; Hardy, 'Manual of Buddhism,' pp. 98, etc.. 180, 318, 445, etc.
Within the classic world, the ancient Egyptians are described as maintaining a doctrine of migration, whether by successive embodiments in a " cycle of necessity" through creatures of earth, sea, and air, and back again to man, or by the simpler judicial penalty which sent back the wicked dead to earth as unclean beasts. The pictures and hieroglyphic sentences of the Book of the Dead are still preserved, and though the ambiguity of its formulas and the difficulty of distinguishing material from nrystical meaning in its doctrine make it of little use as a check upon the classic accounts, yet it shows at least that notions of metamorphosis of the soul did hold a large place in the Egyptian religion.1 In Greek philosophy, great teachers stood forth to proclaim it. Plato had mythic knowledge to convey of souls entering such new incarnations as their glimpse of real existence had made them fit for, from the body of a philosopher or a lover down to the body of a tyrant and usurper; of souls transmigrating into beasts and rising t again to man according to the lives they led; of birds that were light-minded souls; of oysters suffering in banishment the penalty of utter ignorance. Pythagoras is made to illustrate in his own person his doctrine of metempsychosis, by recognizing where it hung in Here's temple the shield he had carried in a former birth, when he was that Euphorbos whom Menelaus Flew at the siege of Troy. Afterwards he was Hermotimos, the Klazomenian prophet whose funeral rites were so prematurely celebrated while his soul was out, and after that, as Lucian tells the story, his prophetic soul passed into the body of a cock. Mikyllos asks this cock to tell him about Troy—were things there really as Komer said? But the cock replies, " How should Homer have known, O Mikyllos? When the Trojan war was going on, he was a camel in Baktria !" 2
1 Hdrod. ii. 123, see Bawlinson's Tr.; Plutarch. De Iside 31, 72; Wilkinson, 'Ancient Ej;.' vol. ii. ch. xvi. ; Bunsen, 'Egypt's Place in Univ. Hist.' vols. iv. and v.
2 Plat. Phsedo, Tim:eus, Phsedrus, Repub. Pindar. Olymp. ii. antistr. 4;
In the later Jewish philosophy, the Kabbalists took up the doctrine of migration, the gilgul or " rolling on " of souls, and maintained it by that characteristic method of Biblical interpretation which it is good to hold up from time to time for a warning to the mystical interpreters of our own day. The soul of Adam passed into David, and shall pass into the Messiah, for are not these initials in the very name of Ad(a)m, and does not Ezekiel say that "my servant David shall be their prince for ever.'' Cain's soul passed into Jethro, and Abel's into Moses, and therefore it was that Jethro gave Moses his daughter to wife. Souls migrate into beasts and birds and vermin, for is not Jehovah " the lord of the spirits of all flesh ?" and he who has done one sin beyond his good works shall pass into a brute. He who gives a Jew unclean meat to eat, his soul shall enter into a leaf, blown to and fro by the wind; "for ye shall be as an oak whose leaf fadeth; " and he who speaks ill words, his soul shall pass into a dumb stone, as did Nabal's, " and he became a stone.''1 Within the range of Christian influence, the Manicheeans appear as the most remarkable exponents of the metempsychosis. We hear of their ideas of sinners' souls transmigrating into beasts, the viler according to their crimes; that he who kills a fowl or rat will become a fowl or rat himself; that souls can pass into plants rooted in the ground, which thus have not only life but sense; that the souls of reapers pass into beans and barley, to be cut down in their turn, and thus the elect were careful to explain to the bread when they ate it, that it was not they who reaped the corn it was made of; that the souls of the auditors, that is, the spiritually low commonalty who lived a married life, would pass into melons and cucumbers, to finish their purification by being eaten by the elect. But these details come to us from the accounts of bitter theological adversaries, and
Ovid. Metam. xv. 160; Lncian. Snmn. 17, etc. Philostr. Tit. Apullon. Tyran. See also Mover's Conversations-Lexicon, art. 'Seelenwauderung.' For rebirth in old Scandinavia, see Helgaqvidha, iii., in 'Edda.' 1 Ei-enmenger, part ii. p. 23, etc.
the question is. how much of them did the Manichaeans really and soberly belisve? Allowing for exaggeration and constructive imputation, there is reason to consider the account at least founded on fact. It seems clear that the Manichaean sect, when they fused together Zarathustrism, Buddhism, and Christianity, into a transcendental ascetic faith, adopted the Hindu theory of penance and purification of souls by migration into animals and plants, probably elaborating it meanwhile into fresh and fanciful details.1 In later times, the doctrine of metempsychosis has been again and again noticed in a district of South-western Asia. William of Ruysbroek speaks of the notion of souls passing from body to body as general among the mediaeval Nestorians, even a somewhat intelligent priest consulting him as to the souls of brutes, whether they could find refuge elsewhere so as not to be compelled to labour after death. Rabbi Benjamin of Tudela records in the 12th century of the Druses of Mount Hennon: "They say that the soul of a virtuous man is transferred to the body of a new-born child, whereas that of the vicious transmigrates into a dog, or some other animal." Such ideas indeed, seem not yet extinct in the modern Druse nation. Among the Nassairi, also, transmigration is believed in as a penance and purification: we hear of migration of unbelievers into camels, asses, dogs, or sheep, of disobedient Nassairi into Jews, Sunnis, or Christians, of the faithful into new bodies of their own people, a few such changes of "shirt" (i.e. body), bringing them to enter paradise or become stars.2 An instance of the belief within the limits of modern Christian Europe may be found among the Bulgarians, whose superstition is that Turks who have never eaten pork in life will become wild boars after death. A party assembled to feast on a boar has been known to throw it all away, for the moat jumped off the spit into the fire, and a piece of cotton was found in the ears, which the wise man decided to be a piece of the ci-devant Turk's turban.1 Such cases, however, are exceptional. Metempsychosis never became one of the great doctrines of Christendom, though not unknown in mediaeval scholasticism, and though maintained by an eccentric theologian here and there into our own times. It would be strange were it not so. It is in the very nature of the development of religion that speculations of the earlier culture should dwindle to survivals, yet be again and again revived. Doctrines transmigrate, if souls do not; and metempsychosis, wandering along the course of ages, came at last to animate the souls of Fourier and Soame Jenyns.2
1 Beausobre, ' Hist. de Manichee,' etc., vol. i. pp. 245—6, vol. ii. pp. 496—9. Ste Au^ustin. C"titra Faust.; De Hseres. ; De Quantitate Animse.
* Giil, ile Uubruquis in 'Rtc. des Voy. Soc.-de Geographic de Paris,' vol. iv. p. 3."itJ. benjamin of Tudcln, id and tr. by Asher, Hebrew 22, En;;, p. 6J. Nitbuhr, 'Reiaebesehr. uach Arabien,' etc. vol. ii. pp. 438—443 ; llciucrs, vol. ii. p. 796.
Thus we have traced the ancient theory of metempsychosis in stage after stage of the world's civilization, scatt ered among the native races of America and Africa, established in old Egypt, elaborated by the Hindu mind into its great system of ethical philosophy, reviving and failing through classic and mediaeval Europe, and lingering at last in the modern world as an intellectual crotchet, of little account but to the ethnographer who notes it down as an item of
1 St. Clair and Brophy, 'Bulgaria,' p. ,17. Compare the tenets of the Russian sect of Dukhobortzi, in Hazthauscn, 'Russian Empire,' vol. i. p. 288, etc.
2 Since the first publication of the above remarli, M. Louis Figuier has supplied a perfect modern instance by his book, entitled 'Le Lendemain de la Mort,' translated into English as 'The Day after Death: Our Future Life according to Science.' His attempt to revive the ancient behef, and to connect it with the evolution-theory of modern uaturalisis, is carried out with more than Buddhist elaborateness. Body is the habitat of soul, which goes out when a man dies, as one forsakes a burning bouse. In the course of development, a soul may migrate through bodies stage after stage, zoophyte and oyster, grasshopper and eagle, crocodile and dog, till it arrives at man, thence ascending to become one of the superhuman beings or angels who dwell in the planetary other, and theuce to a still higher state, the socret of whose natun M. Figuier does not endeavour to penetrate, "because our means of investigation fail at this point." The ultimate destiny of the more glorified beinf is the Sun ; the pure spirits who form its mass of burning gases, pour out genus and life to start the course of planetary existence. (Note to 2nd edition.)