« PreviousContinue »
and May.1 In the last five or ten days of their year the Zoroastrians hold their feasts for departed relatives, when souls come back to the world to visit the living, and receive from them offerings of food and clothing.2 The custom of setting empty seats at the St. John's Eve feast, for the departed souls of kinsfolk, is said to have lasted on in Europe to the seventeenth century. Spring is the season of the time-honoured Slavonic rite of laying food on the graves of the dead. The Bulgarians hold a feast in the cemetery on Palm Sunday, and, after much eating and drinking, leave the remains upon the graves of their friends, who, they are persuaded, will eat them during the night. In Russia such scenes may still be watched on the two appointed days called Parents' Days. The higher classes have let the rite sink to prayer at the graves of lost relatives, and giving alms to the beggars who flock to the cemeteries. But the people still "howl" for the dead, and set out on their graves a handkerchief for a tablecloth, with gingerbread, eggs, curd-tarts, and even vodka, on it; when the weeping is over, they eat up the food, especially commemorating the dead in Russian manner by partaking of his favourite dainty, and if he were fond of a glass, the vodka is sipped with the ejaculation, "The Kingdom of Heaven be his! He loved a drink, the deceased !"3 When Odilo, Abbot of Cluny, at the end of the tenth century, instituted the celebration of All Souls',4 he set on foot one of
1 Ovid. Fast. ii. 533; v. 420.
1 Bleek, 'Avcsta,' vol. ii. p. 31 ; vol. iii. p. 86; Alger, p. 137.
* Hannsch, 'Slaw. Myth.'pp. 374, 408 ; St. Clair and Brophy, 'Bulgaria,' p. 77 ; Romanoff, 'Greco-Roman Church,' p. 255.
4 Petrns Damianus, 'VitaS. Odilonis,' in the Bollnndist 'Acta Sanctorum, Jan. 1, has the quaint legend attached to the new ordinance. An island hermit dwelt near a volcano, where souls of the wicked were tormented in the flames. The holy man heard the officiating d31110ns lament that their daily task of new torture was interfered with by the prayers and alms of devout persons leagued against them to save souls, aud especially they complained of the monks of Cluny. Thereupon the hermit sent a message to Abbot Odilo, who carried out the work to the efficacy of which he had received such perfect spiritual testimony, by decreeing that Nov. 2, the day after All Saints', should be set apart for services for the departed.
those revivals which have so often given the past a new lease of life. The Western Church at large took up the practice, and round it, on the second of November, there naturally gathered surviving remnants of the primitive rite of banquets to the dead. The accusation against the early Christians, that they appeased the shades of the dead with feasts like the Gentiles, would not be beside the mark now, fifteen hundred years later. All Souls' Day keeps up, within the limits of Christendom, a commemoration of the dead which combines some touches of pathetic imagination with relics of savage animism scarcely to be surpassed in Africa or the South Sea Islands. In Italy the day is given to feasting and drinking in honour of the dead, while skulls and skeletons in sugar and paste form appropriate children's toys. In Tyrol, the poor souls released from purgatory fire for the night may come and smear their burns with the melted fat of the "soul-light" on the hearth, or cakes are left for them on the table, and the room is kept warm for their comfort. Even in Paris the souls of the departed come to partake of the food of the living. In Brittany the crowd pours into the churchyard at evening, to kneel bareheaded at the graves of dead kinsfolk, to fill the hollow of the tombstone with holy water, or to pour libations of milk upon it. All night the church bells clang, and sometimes a solemn procession of the clergy goes round to bless the graves. In no household that night is the cloth removed, for the supper must be left for the souls to come and take their part, nor must the fire be put out, where they will come to warm themselves. And at last, as the inmates retire to rest, there is heard at the door a doleful chant—it is the souls, who, borrowing the voices of the parish poor, have come to ask the prayers of the living.1
If we ask how the spirits of the dead are in general sup
1 Bastian, 'Mensch,' vol. ii. p. 336. Meiners, vol. i. p. 816 ; vol. ii. p. 290. AVuttke, 'Deutsche VolksaberRlaube,' p. 216. Cortet, 'Fetea Keligieusos,' p. 233; 'Westminster Rev.' Jan. 1860; Hersart de la Villamarque, 'Chants de la Bretagne,' vol. ii. p. 307.
posed to feed on the viands set before them, we come upon difficult questions, which will be met with again in discussing the theory of sacrifice. Even where the thought is certainly that the departed soul eats, this thought may be very indefinite, with far less of practical intention in it than of childish make-believe. Now and then, however, the sacrificers themselves offer closer definitions of their meaning. The idea of the ghost actually devouring the material food is not unexampled. Thus, in North America, Algonquin Indians considered that the shadow-like souls of the dead can still eat and drink, often even telling Father Le Jeune that they had found in the morning meat gnawed in the night by the souls. More recently, we read that some Potawatomis will leave off providing the supply of food at the grave if it lies long untouched, it being concluded that the dead no longer wants it, but has found a rich huntingground in the other world.1 In Africa, again, Father Cavazzi records of the Congo people furnishing their dead with supplies of provisions, that they could not be persuaded that souls did not consume material food.2 In Europe the Esths, offering food for the dead on All Souls', are said to have rejoiced if they found in the morning that any of it was gone.3 A less gross conception is that the soul con
1 Le Jeune in 'Rel . des Jes.' 1631, p. 16; Waitz, vol. iii. p. 195.
* Cavazzi, 'Congo,' etc. book i. 1!G5.
* Grimm, 'D. M.' p. 86."i, but not so in the account of the Feast of the Dead in Boecler, 'Ehsten Abergl. Gebr.' (ed. Kreutzwald), p. 89. Compare Martins, 'Kthnog. Amer.' vol. i. p. 345 (Ges). The following passage from a spiritualist journal, "The Medium," Feb. 9, 1872, shows this primitive notion curiously surviving in modern England. "Every time we sat at dinner, we had not only spirit-voices calling to us, but spirit-hands touching us; and last evening, as it was his farewell, they gave us a special manifestation, unasked for and nnlo, ked for. He sitting at the right hand of me, a vacant chair opposite to him began moving, and, in answer to whether it would have some dinner, said "Yes." 1 then asked it to select what it would take, when it choi-e crr/qucts des pommet de terrc (a French way of dressing potatoes, about three inches long and two wide. I will send you one that you may see it.) I was desired to put this on the chair, either in a tablespoon or on a plate. I placed it in a tablespoon, thinking that probably the plati5 might be broken. In a few seconds I was told that it was eaten, and looking, found the half of it gone, with the marks showing the teeth." (Note to 2nd ed.)
snmes the steam or savour of the food, or its essence or spirit. It is said to have heen with such purpose that the Maoris placed food hy the dead man's side, and some also with him in the grave.1 The idea is well displayed among the natives in Mexican districts, where the souls who come to the annual feast are described as hovering over and smelling the food set out for them, or sucking out its nutritive quality.2 The Hindu entreats the nmnes to quaff the sweet essence of the offered food; thinking on them, he slowly sets the dish of rice before the Brahmans, and while they silently eat the hot food, the ancestral spirits take their part of the feast.3 At the old Slavonic meals for the .dead, we read of the survivors sitting in silence and throwing morsels under the table, fancying that they could hear the spirits rustic, and see them feed on the smell and steam of the viands. One account describes the mourners at the funeral banquet inviting in the departed soul, thought to be standing outside the door, and every guest throwing morsels and pouring drink under the table, for him to refresh himself. What lay on the ground was not picked up, but was left for friendless and kinless souls. When the meal was over, the priest rose from table, swept out the house, and hunted out the souls of the dead "like fleas," with these words, "Ye have eaten and drunken, souls, now go, now go!"4 Many travellers have described the imagination with which the Chinese make such offerings. It is that the spirits of the dead consume the impalpable essence of the food, leaving behind its coarse material substance, wherefore the dutiful sacrificers, having set out sumptuous feasts for ancestral souls, allow them a proper time to satisfy their appetite, and then fall to themselves.5 The Jesuit Father Christoforo Borri suggestively translates the native idea into his own scholastic phraseology. In Cochin China,
l Taylor, 'New Zealand,' p. 220, see 104. 1 Brasseur, 'Mcxicjuo,' vol. iii. p. 24.
* Colebrooke, 'Essays,' vol. i. p. 163, etc. ; Mann. iii.
* Hanusch, *Slaw. Myth," p. 408; Hartkuoch, 'Preussen,' part i. p. 1ST.
* Doulittle, 'Chinese,' vol. ii. pp. 33, 48 ; Meiuers, vol . i. p. 318.
according to him, people believed "that the souls of the dead have need of corporeal sustenance and maintenance, wherefore several times a year, according to their custom, they make splendid and sumptuous banquets, children to their deceased parents, husbands to their wives, friends to their friends, waiting a long while for the dead guest to come and sit down at table to eat." The missionaries argued against this proceeding, but were met by ridicule of their ignorance, and the reply "that there were two things in the food, one the substance, and the other the accidents of quantity, quality, smell, taste, and the like. The immaterial souls of the dead, taking for themselves the substance of the food, which being immaterial is food suited to the incorporeal soul, left only in the dishes the accidents which corporeal senses perceive; for this the dead had no need of corporeal instruments, as we have said." Thereupon the Jesuit proceeds to remark, as to the prospect of conversion of these people, "it may be judged from the distinction they make between the accidents and the substance of the food which they prepare for the dead," that it will not be very difficult to prove to them the mystery of the Eucharist.1 Now to peoples among whom prevails the rite of feasts of the dead, whether they offer the food in mere symbolic pretence, or whether they consider the souls really to feed on it in this spiritual way (as well as in the cases inextricably mixed up with these, where the offering is spiritually conveyed away to the world of spirits), it can be of little consequence what becomes of the gross material food. When the Kafir sorcerer, in cases of sickness, declares that the shades of ancestors demand a particular cow, the beast is slaughtered and left shut up for a time for the shades to eat, or for its spirit to go to the land of shades, and then is taken out to be eaten by the sacrificers.2 So, in more civilized Japan, when the survivors have placed
1 Born, 'Relatione delia Nuova Jlissione della Comp. di Giosu,' Rome, 1631, p. 208; and in Pinkerton, vol. ix. p. 822, etc. 3 Grout, 'Zulu Land,' p. 140 ; see Callaway, 'Rel. of Amazulu,' p. 11.