Reconceptualising Conversion: Patronage, Loyalty, and Conversion in the Religions of the Ancient MediterraneanDie Studie nimmt die bisherige Diskussion der Konversion in der Antike neu auf durch eine Verknüpfung von klassischen, epigraphischen und biblischen Quellen mit einer sozialwissenschaftlichen Methodologie. Der Autor hinterfragt dabei die bisher vorausgesetzte psychologische Kontinuität zwischen antiken und modernen Menschen und bietet statt dessen ein Modell, welches an den Denkvoraussetzungen der Antike selbst gebildet wurde. Die griechisch-römischen und mediterranen Religionen und Philosophien - also auch das hellenistische Judentum und das Christentum - orientierten sich an den Modellen von Patronat und Loyalität. Das Verständnis der antiken Konversion muss also hier ansetzen. In diesem Zusammenhang wird auch die "Bekehrung" des Paulus neu gedeutet. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 89
... claims of the Christian tradition , only some of which are implicit , Paul was not a paradigm - setting convert who was without peer or parallel in the ancient world . Paul was like his peers when it comes to how he talked about and how ...
... claim that the God of the Hellenistic Jews was framed in the same manner . We might call this divine patronage ... claims is not , in the interest of space , handled directly , but rather can be seen from the total collection of ...
... claim ( sometimes it is true and sometimes it is simply claimed ) that clients were approached by a patron , as opposed to approaching the patron themselves , in order to be benefited . It is an interesting feature of patronage and ...
... claim that Paul was exactly the same as a modern person , but accounts for the differences between Paul and modern counterparts by appealing to the evolutionary approach to psychology : Paul and other ancient writers reflect ...
... claims reflects Paul's " self- loathing " and " self - despair . " He also claims that in Paul , no differently from his modern examples , the " interior is a battle - ground for what [ one ] feels to be two deadly hostile selves ...
Contents
1 | |
13 | |
15 | |
22 | |
31 | |
49 | |
53 | |
54 | |
36 Conclusion | 148 |
The Rhetoric of Patronage and Benefaction in Pauls Conversion Passages | 151 |
1 1617 15810 | 155 |
1117 | 170 |
4b11 | 179 |
44 Paul and the Patronage of Philosophy | 186 |
45 Conclusion | 192 |
Patronage and Benefaction Loyalty and Conversion | 199 |
Patronage vs Benefaction | 59 |
23 Human Patronage and Benefaction | 67 |
24 Divine Patronage and Benefaction | 76 |
25 Divine Patronage and Benefaction in Hellenistic Judaism | 79 |
26 Conclusion | 88 |
The Rhetoric of Patronage and Benefaction | 91 |
31 The Call of the PatronBenefactor | 93 |
32 Persuasion and Philosophical Conversion | 100 |
33 Prayer Praise and Proselytism | 108 |
34 Patronal Synkrisis | 117 |
35 The Χάρις of the PatronBenefactor | 132 |
51 The Nature of Loyalty | 201 |
52 Loyalty and Patronage and Benefaction | 215 |
53 Loyalty Conversion and Paul | 243 |
54 Conclusion | 250 |
Conclusion | 251 |
Bibliography | 257 |
Index of Primary Sources | 287 |
Index of Names and Subjects | 303 |
Index of Modern Authors | 307 |