Page images
[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]



[ocr errors]

done per

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]


a whira bosh

[ocr errors]


[ocr errors]

Qe the Treatis


Fora bolin

G nila do acided in Thin ne

eppulizi ampla dar nedird tic w.

- fotoyau eule where

sive in

ways oh, who is opponited as universal dwar desmeral mangur,

an a te when de das received the monei. einmediality, res and fourchasew what is neceste.. ana parejas leva att persona ofron dare and all

which shalip

and autuia Obaidus need. And then ho hire together bentar the same

1 not only then tables, hit then dress is incon , non frais wailer Hirv ane thiet dveho femnatio Sto stawuv bybrotu nerobte1, oo hah whver wano mis ar liberly without restant to go and hatwalisha dina de cherno dnia what belongs to ne

one belap hallo andan lha otha kandahalen bilato

to do the wtuu he bila pt lank undice challend ggcuising oor oude Lec; cared from thă comun.

coment resources, benx allan The genund care and anxiety of the istan Con tein leator auf. a bonus soon


al lave ured up Voc N. 15. While cay, and a pray ens the elders sit down to meah, olice obserwis the order for they do not toch a thin a locos who aru akaniudiin seangfolie auch ut ai Ome

they have at dached runseloes to this that only lalab, hat there where They

and there are from the earliest infants Anveginu vyj garsaia wavuti. santcovbyły

whichische romant brank he ane "Prince. The women alio ohare úú

also chare in the fan, the green part of when then, a oce,

vinjens in respect of the punity. (net indend ante, nec

reconi, ajoms 11. Foret), who Xave been coming

impelled to then chostaty

recon shara. They weud Luán face, y acorralau tate/PRINTED BY RICH AND KINDER, GREEN ARBOUR count, OLD BAILEY.

au adnica hin

wydau, with to pass then wes xx dwing

au un cucharlie

• porrig which the coul mati allached a Sod, is afne ate to powder ital,

of tunelielf, the Father acwing ihrecata cully by the inullets. And in the order




[ocr errors]


they are elder darzuia

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]


[ocr errors]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

ho have

[ocr errors]

Den e exfolanations of the saened scriptures ambelian by ramstie expresions in all firies ax the expre unnt seem to the bod

and the niaalane

mennegooo cealed andende i beneath the plain word resuntry In out." {Fialki bilti talent, t.eth a poica svetla parabessiin (iluporiun tai spestte, si о Then one an rinig ut tips and

romade inhenen Ley dave

behne heur per a

many, Bolens .

prier du med sex und lace ainew THE FIRST EDITIÓN.

Coefhv.15.19.20 Iner have also the writenfor ancientmen, been the founders &

are rout in another law all behind Jinerier

The allegorical system a

unihe Further as a fand, wieder vee ww. Y>

where they ocaptanation, enhen Roshni bohito !!

To those whose interest is already so much awakened
upon the subject of the divine origin of Christianity,
that they feel the necessity of arriving at some certain
conclusion, more than they fear any possible results to
which such inquiries may lead, this attempt to contri-
bute to the solution of the difficult question is offered.

The hypothesis, that there is a mixture of truth and
fable in the four Gospels, has been admitted, in different
degrees, by many critics bearing the Christian name.
The same method of free investigation which led
Priestley and Belsham to throw doubt upon the truth
of the opening chapters of Matthew and Luke, may
allow other inquirers to make further excisions from
the Gospel history. The reasons given by those emi-
nent critics for proceeding so far may appear more valid

any which can be urged for stopping where they did. The right of private judgment in the separation of truth from fiction being once accorded, the precise limits which ought to be assigned to the credible portion of the miraculous narratives are far from being obvious ; and the ascertaining of these limits becomes a matter of interesting research to all who wish to know

what they are to believe or disbelieve on the subject of the Christian religion.

The following pages are the result of an investigation undertaken with this view, and pursued for some time with the expectation that, at least, the principal miraculous facts supposed to lie at the foundation of Christianity would be found to be impregnable ; but it was continued with a gradually increasing conviction that the true account of the life of Jesus Christ, and of the spread of his religion, would be found to contain no deviation from the known laws of nature, nor to require, for their explanation, more than the operation of human motives and feelings, acted upon by the peculiar circumstances of the age and country whence the religion originated.

The analysis of the four Gospels, proceeding on the admission that they may contain a mixture of truth and error, is a very complicated but not impracticable task. It is necessary to form an opinion as to the date of each writing, the general character of each author, and his peculiarities as a writer; to institute continual comparisons between the events or discourses which he relates, and the opinions and controversies which arose subsequently to his own time; to weigh the probability in favour of the realoccurrence of a fact, considered in reference to the ascertained history of the time, with that in favour of its invention by the author or some intermediate narrator; to consider what greater degree of weight is due to the testimony from the accordance of all, or of several of the writers ; and to ascertain whether they wrote independently, or copied from each other. By this labo

rious method of sifting and examining, it must be admitted that it would be possible to obtain a tolerably correct history from a collection of records acknowledged to be of a very mixed character.

The doctrine of the divine inspiration, or of the unquestionable veracity, of the Gospel writers, has hitherto hindered the full application of this free method of investigation to the New Testament, on the part of believers in Christianity; and unbelievers seem generally to have been more intent upon raising objections and cavils to the narratives as they stand, than in searching out the real truth. Hence it has frequently been observed, that no clear and intelligible account has been given of the life of Jesus Christ on simply natural grounds; whence it has been argued, that no alternative remains but to regard him as the miraculous endowed personage presented to us in the four Gospels.

The first two chapters of this work give a sketch of conclusions formed in the manner above stated, from the study of the Old and New Testament, and of Josephus. It is admitted that some parts of this sketch cannot claim a higher character than that of plausible conjecture. The authority of the main sources of information being shaken, it is evident that conjecture is, in many cases, all to which the utmost research can attain. The whole is, however, expressed in the historical style, for the sake of simplicity ; consequently, when the reader meets with some assertions not sufficiently supported by the notes, his patience is entreated until he arrives at the chapters which follow.

« PreviousContinue »